Nate Geraci, the President of the ETF Store, stated that a “spot Ethereum ETF is not something the SEC would approve by May.” The drought in communication between issuers and investors can be considered a weak selection for approval. Debates about Ethereum ETFs have been predominantly one-sided rather than the vibrant discussions associated with the trading sessions that preceded the approval of Bitcoin ETFs.

Eric Balchunas, a senior ETF analyst at Bloomberg, very deftly sums up the SEC’s position that “silence is violence.” The SEC’s lack of feedback on Ethereum ETFs reduces the probability of their approval at this time. Balchunas makes a point that the SEC might receive another lawsuit if the applications of numerous Ethereum-backed ETFs are denied, which would indicate that either Grayscale or some other imaginative ETF issuers may challenge this decision.

Ethereum ETFs hold edge over Bitcoin ETFs

Geraci surmises that Eagle or other big-budget ETF issuers might sue the SEC for delaying the transaction of Ethereum ETFs. This is after Grayscale won its legal battle in August, wherein the U.S. District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Grayscale’s Bitcoin ETF application. Geraci suggests that this kind of legal battle might be considered as a strategic marketing cost that gives a company a strong competitive advantage in the market.

Some have also questioned the value of spot Ethereum ETFs. Maybe that’s the reason many of the launched future ETFs based on the value of the second-largest altcoin have not been welcomed well by the market. On the other hand, Geraci notes that the fact that Ethereum has the wave’s huge market cap of $379 billion is something that analysts and issuers should not ignore. Although investors appear to have less interest in the futures-based Ethereum ETFs, Geraci asserts that the Ethereum ETFs matter due to the significant developments over the Bitcoin ETFs.

SEC’s silence signals disapproval of Ethereum ETFs

The SEC staying mum on the prospect of ETFs based on Ethereum is a sign of the high disapproval of it in the short run, per the industry experts. The lack of direct contact with the issuers is the speculation fuel of the regulator’s position on the broader Ethereum-related investment products. Despite Bitcoin ETFs leaping forward, no one really knows that new hurdles for Ethereum ETFs will be placed on the way.

Analysts and market participants keep an eye on the SEC’s further actions, analyzing possible epiphenomenons that the rejection of Ethereum ETFs will cause. The crypto industry is still in limbo as there is no clear regulatory framework around the corner. The crypto industry is to figure out further regulations regarding Ethereum investment products. While the challenges are not ignored, the proponents of the Ethereum ETF still believe that one day, it will be approved because of the reference of the cryptocurrency in the broader financial sector.

Earn more CFN tokens by sharing this post. Copy and paste the URL below and share to friends, when they click and visit Parrot Coin website you earn: https://cryptoforum.news0

CFN Comment Policy

Your comments MUST BE constructive with vivid and clear suggestion relating to the post.

Your comments MUST NOT be less than 5 words.

Do NOT in any way copy/duplicate or transmit another members comment and paste to earn. Members who indulge themselves copying and duplicating comments, their earnings would be wiped out totally as a warning and Account deactivated if the user continue the act.

Parrot Coin does not pay for exclamatory comments Such as hahaha, nice one, wow, congrats, lmao, lol, etc are strictly forbidden and disallowed. Kindly adhere to this rule.

Constructive REPLY to comments is allowed