Despite previous reports from Matrixport predicting significant capital inflows from mainland Chinese investors into Hong Kong-listed Bitcoin ETFs, recent clarifications from several issuers have dismissed these expectations. The issuers have confirmed that mainland Chinese funds are prohibited from investing in such cryptocurrency-related ETFs by regulatory constraints.
Several issuers of Bitcoin ETFs in Hong Kong told WuBlockchain that southbound funds from mainland China are definitely unable to buy cryptocurrency ETFs, and the Matrixport report is false. An earlier Matrixport report indicated that Bitcoin spot ETFs listed in Hong Kong are…
— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) April 13, 2024
Misconceptions Corrected by ETF Issuers
Communication from ETF issuers in Hong Kong in recent times has rectified misunderstandings regarding the investment capabilities of Chinese investors in the mainland participating in the Southbound Stock Connect program.
According to sources, several prominent issuers that WuBlockchain interviewed, too, have openly stated that mainland Chinese investors are currently not allowed to purchase ETFs for cryptocurrency, including Bitcoin. This clarification contradicts Matrixport’s earlier report that up to US$25 billion could migrate from mainland China to Bitcoin ETFs in Hong Kong.
Regulatory Environment and Investment Restrictions
The Chinese regulatory environment is characterized by strict regulations regarding cryptocurrencies and in assets that are associated with them, including trading and investment. The Southbound Stock Connect program, which was created to promote cross-border investment between mainland China and Hong Kong, does not include digital currency products, which is due to China’s conservative position on cryptocurrency risk. This omission reflects the wider regulatory approach taken in mainland China to control the exposure of the financial system to cryptocurrencies.
The revelation from the ETF issuers has triggered a re-evaluation of the market expectations concerning the potential of attracting mainland Communist Party of China to Bitcoin ETFs in Hong Kong. Investors who had expected a wider market participation are now reevaluating the effect of regulatory limitations on the development of cryptocurrency investment products in the area.
The market’s reaction highlights the crucial role of regulatory settings in determining the viability and attractiveness of financial products in interconnected markets such as those of Hong Kong and Mainland China.
Expansion of HK’s ETF Market
Despite these setbacks in cryptocurrency ETF investment from mainland Chinese funds, Hong Kong continues to expand its ETF market, with several new products and increased trading volumes observed over recent months. Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited reported a noticeable growth in the ETF sector, with average daily turnovers reaching significant figures.
This growth indicates a healthy expansion of Hong Kong’s financial markets, attracting diverse international investments, albeit with a noted absence of mainland Chinese capital in the cryptocurrency sector.
Read Also: Ethereum Price Finds Demand at 38.2% FIB Amid Market Sell-off; Buy this Dip?
The post Mainland Chinese Cannot Buy HK Bitcoin ETFs, Issuers Clarify appeared first on CoinGape.
Earn more CFN tokens by sharing this post. Copy and paste the URL below and share to friends, when they click and visit Parrot Coin website you earn: https://cryptoforum.news0
CFN Comment Policy
Your comments MUST BE constructive with vivid and clear suggestion relating to the post.
Your comments MUST NOT be less than 5 words.
Do NOT in any way copy/duplicate or transmit another members comment and paste to earn. Members who indulge themselves copying and duplicating comments, their earnings would be wiped out totally as a warning and Account deactivated if the user continue the act.
Parrot Coin does not pay for exclamatory comments Such as hahaha, nice one, wow, congrats, lmao, lol, etc are strictly forbidden and disallowed. Kindly adhere to this rule.
Constructive REPLY to comments is allowed